AfrikanDiamond's Xanga

Kwanzaa Stories: Benjamin "Pap" Singleton- The Black Exodusters

Sat, 29 Dec 2007 11:22:39 GMT

Kwanzaa Stories: Benjamin "Pap" Singleton-The Black Exodusters
It is important, most important for us to teach our children the stories of our heroes. Some of these heroes are in our own families and the stories should be handed down. Kwanzaa is a good time for that. There should be at least 7 stories told each night of the celebration to give our children good strong roots and a sense of who they are. Kwanzaa will also have a lot more meaning for them if they can research the hero for a particular day of Kwanzaa and tell that story, or even act it out.

Try it and see what works for you and your family.

Here is a personal favorite:

Benjamin "Pap" Singleton
(1809-1892)

A leader in the "Great Exodus" that brought thousands of African Americans west from the post-Reconstruction South, Benjamin Singleton became toward the end of his life a pioneer of black nationalism who launched one of the first back-to-Africa movements in the United States.

Singleton was born in 1809 in Nashville, Tennessee, where he was several times sold as a slave but always managed to escape. Eventually, he fled to Canada, then settled in Detroit, Michigan, where he ran a boardinghouse that frequently sheltered runaway slaves.

Returning to Tennessee after the Civil War, Singleton became convinced that it was his mission to help his people improve their lives. He began in the late 1860's by organizing an effort to buy up Tennessee farmland for blacks, but this plan failed when white landowners refused to sell at fair prices.

Undaunted, Singleton set his sights on Kansas, where he and a partner named Columbus Johnson staked out a black settlement in Cherokee County (which failed) and a second settlement in Morris County. Singleton spread the word about his settlements through posters that circulated widely across the South, and he formed a company with Johnson that helped hundreds of black Tennesseans move to Kansas between 1877 and 1879.

Those who answered Singleton's call to head west became known as "Exodusters," and Singleton himself was described as the "Father of the Exodus." But the massive migration of African Americans from the South that reached a peak in 1879 was not inspired by Singleton alone. The driving force was the withdrawl of federal troops from the South in 1877, which marked the official end of Reconstruction and the return of racial oppression through segregation laws and the terrorist activities of groups like the Ku Klux Klan. By 1879, which became known as the year of the "Great Exodus," some 50,000 blacks had fled to freedom in Kansas, Missouri, Indiana and Illinois, while thousands more had been turned back by whites patrolling the rivers and roads.

In 1880, Singleton was called to testify at Congressional hearings on the alarming migration of blacks from the South. By 1881, however, Singleton had begun a new phase in his campaign to aid his people, organizing a party called the United Colored Links in a black section of Topeka, Kansas, called "Tennessee Town" because so many natives of that state lived there. Affiliated with the Greenbacks, a white workers' party that called for fundmental social change in the United States, Singleton's Links party was intended to help African Americans acquire their own factories and start their own industries. Unfortunately, Singleton soon discovered that there was not enough capital within the black community to achieve this goal.

Shifting his sights again, in 1883 Singleton founded an organization called the Chief League, which encouraged blacks to emigrate to the island of Cyprus. Few responded to his call, so in 1885 he formed the Trans-Atlantic Society to help black people move back to their ancestral homeland in Africa. By 1887, this group, too, had proven unsuccessful. Suffering poor health, Singleton was forced at last to retire from his self-appointed mission, and in 1892 he died in St. Louis. But his vision of a society in which African Americans owned the land, directed the industries and held the power would live on, finding a charismatic champion in Marcus Garvey, whose Universal Negro Improvement Association of the early 1920's briefly realized many of Singleton's dreams.

For more information: Nell Irvin Painter, Exodusters: Black Migration to Kansas Following Reconstruction (University of Kansas Press, 1986).
"Image and Reality on the Kansas Prairie: 'Pap' Singleton's Cherokee County Colony," Kansas History (Summer 1996).

The Program | P

BENJAMIN "PAP" SINGLETON (1809- ? )

Benjamin "Pap" Singleton called himself the "father of the Black Exodus," a movement that began during the late 1860s and continued into the 1880s, when thousands of freedmen resettled in Kansas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Indiana, and other areas. Singleton led nearly 8,000 blacks to Kansas via steamboat, train, and wagon.
Singleton was a former Davidson County slave, born around 1809, and raised and trained as a cabinet maker. After being sold and sent to New Orleans, he escaped back to Nashville and then to Detroit and Canada. During the Civil War years, Singleton left Detroit and returned to Nashville, which was under Union army occupation. He made a living building cabinets and coffins, while he lived in a large Union camp for fugitive slaves along the riverbank in Edgefield (East Nashville, near the Jefferson Street bridge). When peddling his wares, "Pap" Singleton, as his fellow freedmen called him, preached to idle, destitute former-slaves about going west to farm and own federal homestead lands.
In September of 1869, black Nashvillians held a large meeting about migrating from the South Elias Polk, Robert Knowles, Randall Brown, Henry Carter, and Daniel Wadkins argued the pros and cons of leaving the South. Many of Nashville's freedmen were frustrated because of crowded and impoverished conditions, recent outbreaks of racial violence by whites, and the 1869 electoral defeat of their city Republican ticket by white Conservatives (Democrats). When the mass meeting failed to gain a vote for the exodus, Singleton and a Summer County black preacher, Columbus M. Johnson, organized a homestead association. Johnson was concerned about addressing the large federal contraband camps, which housed impoverished freedmen in Gallatin and Hendersonville. In 1872, the association sent a committee to investigate Kansas for settlement. A year later, Johnson, Singleton, and 300 persons boarded steamboats on the Cumberland River to settle in Cherokee County, Wyandotte, and Topeka, Kansas. For years, the north end of Topeka was called "Tennessee Town."
In April of 1875, Singleton, William A. Sizemore, and Benjamin Petway called for a state convention to discuss black migration to the West. The convention met in Liberty Hall (44 Cedar Street, now Charlotte), which was built in 1872 by and for Nashville's first black bank, the Freedman's Savings and Trust Company. The convention formed the Tennessee Emigration Society, sent delegates to Kansas, and resolved: "To the white people of Tennessee, and them alone, are due the ills borne by the colored people of this State." The Memphis Bulletin newspaper reported that the "chiefest ground of discontent is inadequate labor prices and delays in paying the same. A repair of this evil would tend greatly towards checking the flow of [black] immigration out of the State, already begun." Then the Nashville Colored People's Cooperative Emigration Club was formed "to improve the moral, intellectual, social, and material interests of the colored people." The leaders hoped to relieve crowding in Tennessee's urban black neighborhoods, resettle the black poor, and build a politically powerful society in the Far West.
Singleton, Sizemore, and their followers formed the Edgefield Real Estate Association, located at No. 5 Front Street. They held rallies in Brentwood and other black communities, raised funds by charging five cents for parties, and published newspapers to publicize the colored migration. Singleton criticized Frederick Douglass and other Republicans for opposing the freedmen's exodus from the South, saying, "Such men as this should not be leaders of our race any longer." But Douglass simply argued that the Negroes should remain in the South and fight the racist attempts to reenslave them. In Nashville, Singleton plastered lettered posters announcing: "Leave for Kansas on April 15, 1878." He established a colony at Dunlap, Morris County, Kansas, in June of 1879. At least 2,407 local blacks joined the exodus.
The Nashville Union and American called the Black Exodus "a foolish project," and white employers supported a campaign to attract Chinese laborers to replace the black workers. By 1882, the Black Exodus had stopped. The waters of the Cumberland River washed out all traces of the black emigrants who boarded so many steamboats near Edgefield. Benjamin "Pap" Singleton died out West during the late l880s and was buried in an unidentified grave.

Bobby L. Lovett

+++++++++++++++++++

The King Shark - Oba Behanzin

Tue, 18 Dec 2007 01:29:45 GMT

Behanzin
(1841-1906)

Behanzin, the King of Dahomey, chose the strategy of confrontation to resist French occupation of his kingdom.

Dahomey was one of the most powerful kingdoms in West Africa, deriving its power from trade and its superior army. Highly organized and stable, Dahomey developed one of the most efficient systems of government in West Africa.

France, a late starter, entered the colonial race in West Africa with heightened vigor, marked by military aggression.

In 1882, a French protectorate was declared over Porto Novo, a vassal state of Abomey. By 1885, the French occupied the entire coastal strip West of Porto Novo.

In 1889, King Glele and his son Behanzin, who considered these coastal areas to be part of the kingdom of Dahomey, declared that the Fon people could no longer tolerate France's actions.

In February 1890, the French occupied Cotonou; Behanzin, now king after Glele's sudden death, prepared for war.

At this time, Dahomey had a large standing army and reserves, which could be readily mustered in times of war. It was the strongest and best-organized army on Africa's west coast and comprised of both men and women, including the Amazons, a superior and dreaded fighting force of female warriors.

Behanzin's forces attacked the French simultaneously on two fronts—militarily at Cotonou and economically by destroying the palm plantations at Porto Novo. The latter precipitated an early end to the hostilities. A treaty was signed, with the French continuing to occupy Cotonou, for which Behanzin exacted an annuity.

The peace lasted for two years. However, France was determined to annex Dahomey before the British or Germans did. Behanzin, knowing that he would have to defend his sovereignty, updated his army in the interim.

In 1892, the French, led by Colonel Dodds, a Senegalese mulatto, marched on Abomey.

After fierce fighting, the Fon army, despite using sound military tactics, could not hold back the French forces and suffered heavy losses in a lopsided conflict, determined by the superiority of the French weapons.

Behanzin's proposals for peace were accepted by Dodds, but his terms were an affront to the dignity of the Fon people, and the fighting continued. Dodds relentlessly advanced and entered Abomey, which Behanzin burned before heading to settle in the northern part of his kingdom.

Even in defeat, Behanzin was the symbol of Dahomean resistance and continued to be a serious threat to the French. In 1894, Behanzin surrendered himself to Dodds, but a national surrender was never effected. Behanzin was exiled to the island of Martinique in the West Indies and later transferred to Algeria where he died in 1906.

With Behanzin and his immediate family adamantly refusing to sign a treaty making Dahomey a French protectorate, the French installed their choice, Agoliagbo, as king. Dahomey was then placed under France's protection and it eventually became a French colony.

The independence of one of the best-organized states in West Africa ended, as Dahomey became the last of the traditional African kingdoms to yield to European colonialism.

Books

Africans and Their History, Joseph E. Harris. Penguin USA, second revised edition, 1998.
Buy it in paperback: Amazon.com | Amazon.ca

General History of Africa, Vol. VII: Africa under Colonial Domination, 1880-1935, UNESCO. University of California Press, 1990.
Buy it in hardcover: Amazon.com | Amazon.ca
Buy it in paperback: Amazon.com | Amazon.ca

Topics in West African History, A. Adu Boahen, Jacob F. Ade Ajayi, and Michael Tidy. Addison-Wesley, 1987.
Buy it in textbook binding: Amazon.com | Amazon.ca

(In)Visibility and Duality of the Civil Rights and Yoruba Movements: 1950s-1990s

Sat, 15 Dec 2007 23:03:07 GMT

http://www.africamigration.com/archive_01/f_%20ifagboyede_invisibility.htm
Faola Ifagboyede

California State University, Northridge

This paper will illuminate the Yoruba movement in the U.S. founded by Oba Oseijeman Adefunmi I who is the first African American born in the U.S. to be initiated into the Yoruba priesthood. An examination of the Yorubas in the U.S. in relation to the rise of Dr. Martin Luther King's civil rights movement that also began in the 1950s will explore the dauntless task of addressing the African American racial and cultural identity malady identified by sociologist W.E. B. DuBois as double consciousness: (1) A civil rights agenda based on King's vision of an inalienable right to pursue educational, employment, housing opportunities, and other civil liberties on an equal basis with white Americans or (2) the re-creation of cultural habits based on an approach from a traditional African perspective? DuBois' double consciousness theory as it relates to black-face minstrels in the U.S. will be utilized to illustrate the extent that the bifurcation process of Americanization damaged the racial psyche of African Americans

When slavery ended at the close of the Civil War in 1865, the captives emerged culturally blind and viewed their indigenous African heritage as an extinct relic of "primitive savagery" resulting in what sociologist W. E. B. DuBois defined as double consciousness. Not only were the freed bondsmen alienated from their mother countries, but they were also estranged from captives taken to other parts of the New World.1 The host country serves as the filter by which those in the diaspora measure the authenticity of their racial heritage. The greater the contact those in the diaspora have with the homeland the more intact their ethnic and cultural identities are likely to be. Conversely, the more the disassociation with the home country experienced by the diaspora population, the greater the erosion of customs, ethnicity, and culture. Assimilation into the host country is the desired norm. Although factors such as environment and political considerations can disrupt the interchange with the home country, the diaspora will only cease to have meaning if the idea of an ancestral home is totally lost.2 In the case of the U. S. population, not only was the idea of an ancestral home lost to the former slaves and their descendants, but the nature of the U. S. slave system itself was not conducive to maintaining ties with the homeland. This was in great part due to the drastically changed diet that strict and ancient religious customs were dependent upon, and the unfamiliar climate of the North American continent.3 Whereas, other major slave distribution countries; namely, Cuba, Brazil, Surinam, Haiti, Trinidad, and Puerto Rico maintained a rich cultural exchange with West Africa during the era of slavery, and after it ended, contact between the homeland and slaves in the U. S. was almost entirely severed.4 After the Civil war ended in 1865 and lasting until the rise of the civil rights and Yoruba movements in the 1950s, African Americans in the U. S. were left to view the indigenous homeland through a prism of extrinsic, distorted images that were about them, but not innately from them.

Prior to the outset of the era of slavery beginning in the sixteenth century, European imagery depicting African people was not based on prejudicial racial stereotypes but on their lifestyles ranging from depictions of everyday normal activities, warrior images, images of servants and entertainers, to images of black or 'mixed' Pharaohs.5 In antiquity, the color black did not carry the ominous and racist aura that it later came to have during and after the trans-Atlantic slave trade. Washington observed that "Robert Gainish, John Lok, William Towerson and the entire company which first regularized trade with Africa, good Christians all, returned from Guinea bearing more than slaves and gold. As surely as they deposited gold on English shores they impressed upon English minds their very definite judgments about black people." 6 The first of many racist images that questioned the humanity of African people and depicted them as beasts without any redeeming qualities surfaced along with the rise of the slave trade. Armpit hair, genitalia, fleshiness of the buttocks, width of the nostrils, hair texture, skin coloring, and the intelligence of African people were put under a racial magnifying glass and tediously scrutinized for any similarities to animals. The overwhelming consensus was that African people shared similar traits, physiognomies, and anatomies with animals ranging from domesticated goats to wild apes. Edward Long freely acknowledged the alleged link between African people and the animal species in his pseudoscientific writings. He wrote, "[African people's] & faculties of smell are truly bestial, nor less their commerce with the other sexes; in these acts they are libidinous and shameless as monkeys, or baboons. The equally hot temperament of their women has given probability to the charge of their admitting these animals frequently to their embrace."7

Although the image of the beast was the most potent and dangerous representation associated with the freed slaves, several others merit comment. Centuries old representations of the former slaves as ungodly and savage left them open to the whims of a frontier America whose independence and freedom coincided with irrational racism. Images of Africans against a backdrop of jungle plants and animals were often depicted in popular and commercial art. "The iconography of Africans as savages was determined by the association with nature and flora---often the kind of wild and overwhelming landscape which makes humans appear small."8 The image of Africans as ungodly pagans destined through a biblical curse to remain in a position of perpetual servitude was widely circulated and embedded in the ethno-centrist outlook of white America.9 Not ready to recognize their chattel slaves as human beings and equal citizens, America incorporated these primary images--beastliness, savagery, and ungodliness--into the very framework and infrastructure of America's legal system, popular culture, and religious institutions. "Books such as Charles Carrol, The Negro a Beast (1900) and R. W. Shufeldt, MD, America's Greatest Problem: The Negro (1915), expressed the racist backlash."10 At the close of the Civil War, America did not only reformulate the humanity of the freed slaves but also sought to define itself in relation to millions of ex-slaves that they must now accept as equals or relegate to a caste system that was inherently racist in ideology. The latter was chosen and subsequently a bombardment of theories circulated throughout American popular culture supporting images that purported ex-slaves to be an inferior race of people and deserving of the ensuing laws and attitudes revolving around lynching, share cropping, racial segregation, Jim Crowism, and the gamut of all that it means to be a second-class citizen in the land of one's birth.

Because theatre was the popular entertainment of the day, it served as an ideal conduit to popularize and disperse distorted racist images pertaining to the African race. Although rubbing burnt cork on the face to darken the skin when portraying African characters is a European theatrical tradition, this did not become popular in the United States until the 1860s when blackface minstrels became a mainstay of national popular culture that lasted well into the 20th century.11 White entertainers blacked up their faces with soot or burnt cork and donned a distorted stage persona of what they alleged were true enactments of the plantation slave community. Traveling throughout the U.S. and internationally, "white" blackface minstrel performers portrayed ex-slaves as a people of profound stupidity and uncontained emotion. Toll described the event as a ludicrous imitation of what white America perceived to be the dominant traits of African people. "They burst on stage in makeup which gave the impression of huge eyes and gaping mouths. They dressed in ill-fitting patchwork clothes, and spoke in heavy "nigger" dialects. Once on stage, they could not stay still for an instant. Even while sitting, they contorted their bodies, cocked their heads, rolled their eyes, and twisted their outstretched legs."12 Needless to say, these stage impressions of a people whose humanity was simultaneously deemed subhuman, savage, and ungodly were extremely damaging to any concept of a cohesive ethnic identity. The former slaves and their racial identity were placed in an even more precarious position than legalized slavery. The minstrel messages penetrated deeply into every strata of American society probing and questioning whether African people were of the human race.

For their part, African American performers attempted to address the putrid images of the minstrel show through a focused and unwavering resistance. Krasner explained, "Black representation in the performing arts is rooted in a tradition of resistance to generations of white image makers."13 The images that "white" blackface minstrel performers inundated into the psyche of America through constant performances of distorted "black" representations twisted and hammered out an American rationale that justified the murderous lynching of thousands of freedmen during the early part of the 20th century. The images further consigned the entire African population to a marginalized existence of shame and humiliation about their ethnic identity. The following attitudes formatted as questions help to define the impact of white America's unbridled racism on African Americans: Did the demands of the white audiences who relied on the minstrel performers perceptions of African people actually filter down to the former slaves themselves? Were these false perceptions the foundation on which the freedmen themselves resisted as racist yet ultimately embraced and identified with? The answer to both of the above questions is a resounding yes and serves to shed some light on why a cancerous blanket of self-hatred engulfed the African American mind from Reconstruction to the mid-1950s.

When the slaves entered the post-slavery workforce, there were only two occupations open to them: servitude and entertainment. Those who became entertainers were required by the status quo to cast themselves into an imitation of what "white" blackface minstrel performers called plantation "niggerisms." Beginning in the 1860s, ex-slaves entering the entertainment industry applied burnt cork to their own dark skins and took to the stage in a strange admixture of confrontation, resistance, and parody. In an ironic flux of unwitting racial betrayal, the "black" blackface minstrels readily and willingly participated in the dangerous "game" of denigrating their own racial identity. Although African American minstrel histrionics were invented to entertain, rationalize, justify, and bring to life white America's illogical racist laws and ethnocentric attitudes, the "black" blackface performer had a covertly veiled hidden agenda which was to restore a measure of dignity to the stolen and trampled image of African people. Their mission was to resist, challenge, and de-script the "white" false images and perceptions on the humanism of African people against an ingrained American kaleidoscope of comic "nigger" humor.

Thus, African American performers were forced to negotiate between representations of the "authentic" self and representations of blackness fixed in the minds of audiences accustomed to "white"-created racial smears.14 The paradox of the "black" blackface minstrel performer is easily applicable to the pre-1950s African American quest for a respected racial identity albeit by blending the derogatory images of beastliness, savagery, and ungodliness into a (re)creation of the race based on a bifurcated Americanized ideal. Noting the resulting severed and fragmented identity, DuBois wrote his famous words, "It is a peculiar sensation, this double-consciousness, this sense of always looking at one's self through the eyes of others, of measuring one's soul by the tape of a world that looks on in amused contempt and pity. One ever feels his twoness---an American, a Negro; two souls in one dark body, whose dogged strength alone keeps it from being torn asunder." 15

The Rise of the Yoruba and Civil Rights Movements

The New World racial dilemma that DuBois so passionately and poignantly wrote about in his monumental work, The Souls of Black Folk, still burns deeply in the consciousness of African Americans whose racial identity remains fragmented and even more compounded with troublesome implications and ramifications associated with the distant relationship and loss of indigenous customs. Hence, Shakespeare's quixotic question "to be or not to be" is the constant irresolvable that African Americans decisively and consistently pondered.

The fifties ushered in a sedate American popular culture firmly entrenched in its racist ideology along with total control over the segregated and second class masses of African people subsisting within the dynamics of American-style apartheid. Racial attitudes of white superiority dominated in all areas of black and white contact as America ruthlessly enforced an oppressive mantle of racial inferiority on the African population. However, the dawning of the decade also saw African Americans stirring and uniting with a renewed resolve to resist attempts to undermine their humanity and racial origins. Keenly aware that African people were caught between the two opposing forces of double consciousness---the demand to conform to the distorted images created by minstrels and the desire to reclaim their humanity, two race leaders emerged that felt compelled to address the chronic malady related to the fragmented racial psyche of African Americans.

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. became an immediate race leader on December 1, 1955 after a woman named Rosa Parks refused to compromise her humanity and sit in the back of a public bus with designated segregated seating for African Americans. Under King's leadership, the Montgomery bus boycott culminated with the successful overturning of Jim Crow laws that relegated African people to segregated seating arrangements on public transportation. When the boycott ended one year later, King had become the celebrated and recognized national spokesman of African Americans and the undisputed leader of the burgeoning civil rights movement.16 The emergence of Oba Oseijeman Adefunmi I, the spearhead of Yoruba culture on U. S. soil, was far less spectacular. In 1956, the same year King was crowned by the mass media as a national spokesperson, Adefunmi took two trips out of the country. The first trip was to North-east Africa where he became enthralled with Egyptian antiquities that served to heighten his desire to know more about his African ancestry. In the later part of 1956, he took another trip to the Caribbean islands of Haiti and Cuba where he was introduced to West African indigenous culture and religion within the New World African diaspora.17 These two journeys marked the beginning of Adefunmi's affinity with indigenous African culture. Fifteen years later he established the only community in the U. S. based on traditional West African culture.

When William Bascom, Professor of Anthropology and former director of the Robert H. Lowie Museum of Anthropology at the University of California, Berkeley traveled to Oyotunji Village in the late 1970s, he expressed surprise at the level of accurateness the residents displayed in (re)creating and (re)inventing the indigenous West African culture of their ancestors. "What is truly remarkable is the success of the community in recreating, with amazing accuracy the culture of the Yoruba of Nigeria."18 Today, Oyotunji Village, located in South Carolina's Low Country stands as a testament to the resilience of Adefunmi, who is the first African American born in the U. S. to be initiated into the Yoruba priesthood approximately 600 years after the inception of the trans-Atlantic slave trade.19 Along with the rebirth of traditional religious in the U.S., Adefunmi, who is a professional artist, also revived traditional religious art. Oyotunji Village enjoys an international reputation for its plethora of New World art forms. "As a result of their fervor to proclaim their African identities and their determining that [the deity] Olokun represented the profoundness of the spirituality, genius, and character of African peoples, some of the Olokun sculptural art they created exaggerated older Yoruba/Bini aesthetics and created monuments that were larger than life size."20

Adefunmi and King who were born in 1928 and 1929 respectively matured under the choke hold of American apartheid, yet these astute and intelligent men thoroughly understood the critical identity crisis plaguing African people at the outset of the 1950s. Although they addressed the inter-racial quagmire from entirely different perspectives and methodologies, both of these race leaders were equally challenged to resolve the unsettling questions revolving around the alleged inferiority and sub-humanity of African people. King tackled the angst by pursuing a civil rights agenda based on jure divino and devoutly advocated that God gave his people the right to pursue education, employment, housing, and all other civil and legal liberties on an equal basis with white America. He optimistically believed that an American society built upon the ideals of equality for all its citizenry would allow African Americans the opportunity to strive for their highest potential and would also arouse a sense of fair play from white America to implement justice on behalf of all its citizens.21 As a result of the envisioned success off this two-pronged strategy, King adamantly believed that the problem of double consciousness could alleviate itself and that African people would naturally assimilate into American society. His famous words from the "I Have a Dream" speech in which he states that someday African people "&would be judged by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin" validates this over-all thesis.22 Adefunmi, polarized at the opposite end, believed that African people could only remove the obtrusive taint of their collective inferiority complex if they "&embraced a cultural background from which they could draw."23 He made this observation after attending a Shakespearean drama that was staged with a cast of African Americans. He recalled that his disappointment with an African cast playing white characters led him to Harlem's Schomburg library where he checked out a number of books on Africa. He became interested in African history, but his immediate goal was to write plays about Africa and the diasporic experiences of African Americans so that they would not have to depend on Shakespeare anymore.24

An investigation of the Yoruba and civil rights movements, one virtually invisible and functioning as an outsider and the other under constant public attention and scrutiny, and striving to become an insider can help to extrapolate and examine the continuing problem of Africa America's double consciousness syndrome. Could King's vision couched in such terms as universal suffrage and integration in all areas of America's political, civil, and social liberties resolve the testy crisis surrounding the cultural and racial identity crisis of African Americans? This question exposes the crux of essential aspects of the civil rights movement that were problematic to King and which he seemingly sidestepped or avoided. Furthermore, did he consider the African homeland at all as a primary source of healing when he formulated his objectives for the civil rights movement? Lastly, did he theorize as white America did that African Americans were creolized to the degree that all connections with the homeland were severed as a result of the four hundred year separation?

Adefunmi was undaunted by the magnitude and length of the separation and set out to challenge and change the prevailing creolist view of American citizens---black and white. He advocated that African Americans were not creolized to the extent that a claim to a West African ethnic and cultural identity was forever lost in the tragedy of the trans-Atlantic slave trade and the subsequent four hundred years of chattel slavery. His unwavering belief that a return to traditional West African culture and de-hegemonization would best address the identity crisis motivated him to boldly embrace African customs during the late 1950s while at the same time, King was formulating his integrationist objectives for the civil rights movement. "On May 6, 1957, Adefunmi planned and carried out an African Freedom Day which consisted of a parade on horseback through Central Park and the heart of Harlem. The participants wore African garments made by Adefunmi himself. The parade launched him as a cultural leader, and from that point on, he was a recognized leader and was called upon to speak and plan various activities."25

After his 1959 initiation into Santo as a member of the Yoruba priesthood of Obatala at Mantazas, Cuba, Adefunmi returned to New York consumed with the task of (de)assimilating the African American psyche from its gravitational pull toward the values, mores, and culture of western civilization. He believed there was an acute need for African Americans to (de)assimilate the mind and (re)invent their West African culture if there was to be any rehabilitation of their fragmented identity. "After he was initiated into Santo, he opened the Shango Temple, later named the Yoruba Temple, and began to wear Yoruba clothing. He made a rule that no one could enter the Temple unless they wore African clothes. The simplest form was the dashiki which he introduced in 1960."26

The external debate of whether African Americans were creolized to the degree that their West African roots were no longer important, discernible, or identifiable is well documented in the polemic between Melville Herskovits and E. Franklin Frazier. Herskovits and Frazier who are two leading proponents of the creolist school advanced opposing theses on the question of whether any West African customs survived in the

U. S. According to the creolists, the U.S. slave population and their descendants did not share a common culture and their customs, religious beliefs, dialects, and social structures varied too greatly to influence ethnic and cultural cohesiveness.27 While Herskovits agreed that traditional African culture had been severely eroded, he nevertheless analyzed that some degree of traditional African culture had survived.28 Conversely, Frazier who is of an extremely conservative creolist persuasion expounded that all cultural remnants of the indigenous culture had been destroyed in the melee of slavery and in effect the West African heritage had little or nothing to do with the present African American population in the U.S.29 It is to the revisionists with their emphasis on the continuities in African history and the layered metamorphosis of that history as it relates to diaspora populations in the New World that Adefunmi's Yoruba movement is most closely aligned, while King's ideology is more compatible with Frazier's conservative creolization analysis.

Rather than reach back to Africa for confirmation and healing of their battered and fragmented social identity, King swayed his followers to believe that they should pursue an idealized American dream based on their collaborative efforts to enter American society via the objectives of self-respect, high moral standards, leadership, nonviolence, and a wholehearted work ethic.30 "Martin defined the black freedom struggle as an American movement, or, as he said at the March on Washington, 'a dream deeply rooted in the American dream.'"31 In his early career, King also recognized, expressed, and exhibited solidarity with Nigeria, Ghana, and other oppressed and colonized countries in Africa in the mutual struggle for human rights, but his Protestant background and upbringing were too thoroughly embedded in Southern Baptist Christian doctrines to allow him to embrace authentic African beliefs and customs. King was born into a line of civil rights leaders and inherited the powerful legacies of his grandfather and father who were also prominent Baptist ministers in the Atlanta African American community. "Home and church were the most important influences upon the early life of Martin King, Jr. In both contexts, he was introduced to the integrationist values of protest, accommodation, self-help, and optimism as they were related to the religious themes of justice, love, obedience, and hope." 32

Like African scholars who create artificial historical boundaries because they fail to study African Americans from their collective diasporic experience as a transition, and yet a continuum of African history, did King create further fragmentation among the masses by further alienating them from the fountain of their traditional African origins? Today, we look around and can see African Americans holding prominent positions throughout American government and in all areas of the professional and business sectors. In fact, the National Security Advisor Dr. Condoleezza Rice and Secretary of State Colin Powell are African Americans serving in the administration of President George W. Bush. This reality can be presented in two observations: (1) King's dream is an undisputed fact for African Americans, and (2) it is a vehicle for white America to use as a tool of convenience to promote its international post-fifties political, legal, and social platforms of integration, ethnic tolerance, and equality. Although both of these observations are true as America and its African American citizenry are witnessing tremendous reforms in all areas of social liberties, equality, and civil integration, there is something horribly amiss with the outcome equation. A Los Angeles Times article reported that internecine urban warfare has taken the lives of thousands of African American men and women in this country. 33 This mayhem began during the 1970s when young African American gangs such as the infamous Crips and Bloods gangs were beginning their rise to street power in poor inner city urban areas just as King's civil rights movement was gaining momentum in terms of a noticeable increase in African American social, political, and professional involvement in American society. Crouch's disturbing commentary questions the validity of the civil rights movement. He theorizes that African Americans are slaughtering each other in their own communities due to a "&crisis of ethnic identity that infects not only the black lower class but too many of the black middle class young as well."34

The disparity existing between those that have actually assimilated into American society as a direct result of King's vision and the masses of African Americans that continue to exist in a pseudo-integrated but marginalized and unequal society cannot justify the taking of even one life due to the unresolved identity crisis that continues to ask the haunting question: Who am I? The mere fact that the Bloods and Crips gangs base their internecine hatred on the colors red and blue causes one to speculate: If the Bloods (red) and the Crips (blue) were aware that from an indigenous cultural perspective red and blue represent profound cosmological concepts in terms of West African traditions and are the colors used to venerate powerful Yoruba divinities, would U.S. African American youth still wantonly murder each other in respect to these colors? Hence, did King's civil rights philosophy unknowingly feed into the double consciousness syndrome and further divide the African American psyche with yet another layer of self-imposed (de)Africanizations and consequently add to a more intense bifurcation problem of multiple identities and thereby manufacture an even greater schismatic alienation?

Although the importance and relevance of an African background is recognized in the U.S. and slave descendants use the racially envogue nomenclature African American, it was not until the advent of Adefunmi's Yoruba movement that a historical correlation between the indigenous homeland and the diaspora population in the U.S. was identified and the (re)invention and (re)creation of the "authentic" culture began to take a recognizable form. The primary contention of the creolist school articulates that the process of enslavement itself coupled with the passing on of earlier generations born in Africa and their non replacement with a continual supply of fresh slaves coming directly from the homeland helped to destroy West African customs in the U.S. However, the revisionist school believes that the above approach is negligible because it is founded on assumptions that do not include the African component.

The revisionists explain that historians must view New World slavery as a continuum in the over-all evolution of West African people, their culture, and history. Lovejoy explains, "&from the perspective of Africa, therefore, it is fruitful to examine the condition of slaves in the Americas on the basis that they were still Africans, despite their chattel status, the deracination that accompanied their forced migration, and the sometimes haphazard and sometimes deliberate attempts of Europeans to destroy or otherwise undermine this African identity." 35 Inquiries into the nature of post-slavery African customs in line with the revisionist approach require a cultural reconstruction of the African past in order to uncover historical links between West African traditions and a critical examination of how the authentic culture was impacted in the U.S.

Adefunmi's revisionist approach to the identity crisis was soon dominated by the ancient religion and culture of the Yoruba people whose geographical home is southwest Nigeria. Bascom concluded that Adefunmi's choice of the Yoruba was not surprising. "Not only are the Yoruba one of the largest ethnic groups in Africa, but they also have had a greater influence in the New World than any of the other African peoples brought here during the slave trade." 36 Like King, Adefunmi was also heavily influenced by his father. However, his father unlike King's was an ardent supporter of Marcus Garvey's Black Nationalist movement and the Moorish Science Temple movement of Noble Drew Ali. Young Adefunmi learned early in his childhood that his responsibility was to concern himself with the condition of his own people before anything else. He recalled asking one of his father's associates if he was going to join the army and fight in the Second World War. The man said, "No, why should I go to war?" Adefunmi replied, "To fight for the country." The man told him not to be a fool because "&this country is not yours or mine."37 Differing distinctly from King's southern Baptist background, a Christian ideal based on a western value system was nonexistent in young Adefunmi's childhood, for his father adamantly espoused that freedom for the African American would become a reality only if the people had the foresight and ingenuity to culturally identify with their West African origins. In fact, Adefunmi's father planned to repatriate to Africa, but the war hampered his plans, and he died before it ended.38

Meanwhile, by 1957, King had become the first president of the newly formed Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC). The purpose of the SCLC was to eliminate segregation from all segments of American society and nonviolent direct action was chosen as the best method to achieve civil rights. As the 1960s came into view, King's goal was no longer human rights and racial dignity for the slave descendants but a newly directed objective based on an integrationist policy. "Integration is the great issue of our age, the great issue of our nation and the great issue of our community."39 In sharp contrast, Adefunmi was in the process of (re)creating and (re)inventing Yoruba traditions and customs in the "inner sanctum" of Africa America's most populous community---Harlem, New York City. Working far from the spotlight and the roar of the crowd, Adefunmi and a Haitian singer that he met while designing the costumes for a folk play co-founded a society called the Order of Damballa Hwedo in 1960.40 This event is significant because it marks the resurgence of organized traditional West African religion and its practice in the U.S. by the descendants of the slave population. Damballa Hwedo is a Fon/Yoruban deity that traveled to the New World in the consciousness of captive slaves bound for plantations on the island of Hispanola, present day Haiti.

The veneration of Damballa Hwedo required Adefunmi's early followers to disavow all of the basic tenets of their Judeo-Christian background and embrace the large pantheon of West African Yoruba deities. The order of Damballa Hwedo dissolved after several years because its members began to argue that African Americans could not understand the complexities of venerating a pantheon of deities.41 Adefunmi disagreed because he believed that African Americans could re-inscript their culture even after such a long separation if they were strict and based the foundation of their teachings and religious rituals on traditional West African religious doctrines. Although Adefunmi's early goals were to arrest the images of the minstrel show and bring some measure of respect to the African American image on the stage, he began to advocate that the (re)creation and (re)invention of traditional African religion was a required element in the restoration and reconstruction of the battered African American image and identity. "History has shown that religion can be, and has been, used as a tool to oppress, exploit and alienate or discriminate. It has also been used to liberate and restore people's life and dignity. Either way, it offers to those who view it as the basis for struggle a realization of their full humanity, faith, hope, and courage to continue struggling, in spite of all obstacles and costs."42

The religion of the Yoruba people is an extraordinary complex of ancient ontological, cosmological, mythological, and mystical esoteric doctrines and rituals that Adefunmi assiduously investigated, researched, and internalized. He attracted a sizable following of Harlemites to his Yoruba Temple and throughout the 1960s devoted himself to learning, teaching, and training others in the mystical traditions of the Yoruba. In 1968, he made a much anticipated move. Like the Yoruba deity and prototype Ogun who represents the force of and symbolizes the characteristics of the primal outsider, Adefunmi moved his spiritual base from the urban glare of New York to the reclusive swamps of South Carolina. Although Ogun is often characterized as the eternal outsider who chose to live alone in the forests with only his faithful black dog, Yoruba mythology and folklore also have many legends that characterize Ogun as the machete-weilding deity responsible for and the builder of human civilization.43 Following the directives of Ogun and other powerful Yoruba deities, Adefunmi not only moved his spiritual base, but he also sought to establish an independent Yoruba state within America. He wanted to depict through a living entity the continuity and hegemony of West African ethnic identity and indigenous African culture even in the U. S. among the culturally deprived and disadvantaged African American diaspora. Bascom who lived for many years with the Yoruba people in Nigeria said that what he witnessed in Oyotunji Village was indeed an authentic (re)invention and (re)creation of Yoruba customs in America. "As one who has studied the Yoruba of Nigeria for more than thirty years, and who has spent some time studying Yoruba religion as it is practiced in Cuba, I am fascinated by the degree of success that has been achieved."44

Although Oyotunji Village is off the beaten path, many devotees throughout the New World African diaspora and from the homeland itself come to Oyotunji Village to venerate sacred Yoruba deities enshrined there and to fulfill obligatory rituals and initiations. Adefunmi envisioned Oyotunji Village as a monastery where worshippers could come to be initiated into the various priesthoods and be trained to serve the Yoruba pantheon of deities through chants, dance, and ritual sacrifice. From its founding in 1970 to the present, many hundreds of African Americans have come to Oyotunji Village to perform initiation rites and complete the necessary training required to become a novice. Some of these devotees went back to their urban communities located in inner cities throughout America and established temples and shrines for the feting of the divinities.

Currently, it is impossible to qualify with accuracy the degree of success that Adefunmi's movement has enjoyed in terms of throwing off the chains of mental slavery and healing the African American psychosis of its double consciousness. However, the impact of the Yoruba movement has osmotically expanded to every large city across America that has a sizable African American population. "&if one considers the large number of groups that have evolved since Oseijeman Adefunmi began promoting cultural nationalism in the late 1950s, it would appear that they have already had a noticeable effect. In many cities across America groups whose main purpose is the worship of African religion in particular and the resurrection of African culture in general are evolving."45 The tidal wave of African-based religions sweeping across the U. S. caused Dorothy Ferebee, a radio-station administrator and journalist in Philadelphia to remark, "This is not an alternative religion. If you're black, this is something that's in your cultural DNA."46 Professor of Religion Dr. Tracey Hucks added, "While churches have spawned great civil rights leaders such as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., some young people still think of them as the institutions that taught slaves in Haiti to rise up against their French masters and fend off Napoleon's army."47

When King's great voice was silenced in 1968 by an assassin's bullet, he was a recognizable icon on the international stage where he lobbied for unconditional love and nonviolence as universal values for all of humanity. King's evolved efforts and advocacy for nonviolence as a method of protest and civil disobedience won him world-wide praise and in 1964 he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. However, even with integration and the visible progress of African Americans assimilating into all areas of American society as well as King's much deserved praise, the ramifications of the following underlying issue have yet to be explored in terms of double-consciousness and the ongoing identity crisis: Because religion in America is based totally on Christian doctrines, no one, especially an African American, could become an influential spokesperson representing American ideals without identifying with and appealing to the spirit and teachings of Christianity which are the antithesis of indigenous West African religious and cultural beliefs. Therein lies the enigmatic duality of King's civil rights movement. Indigenous Yoruba religion with its blood sacrifices, trance possessions, divination, polygamous marriage, ancestor worship and nonwestern forms of medicine and healing was unacceptable to status quo American philosophy of religion. Its vilification and demonization by the status quo diminished its acceptability as a source of moral and ethical philosophies that could provide a guide for the good life. This made it impossible for King to embrace the culture and the origins of his forebears if he was to lead his people into an equality of civil rights. The only acceptable code was based on the dominant Protestant ethics of Christianity. Thus, King was constrained to be totally unaware of his traditional origins. In essence, he was forced to repudiate and align the civil rights movement with Christian ideals that validated old, entrenched notions advocating European values and Christian ideals as superior to the "savage" paganism of traditional African religion and culture.

In line with the revisionist school, Malcolm X said, "Our forced importation into this country was not the beginning of our heritage, but a rude interruption. The worst crime white people have committed was to teach us to hate ourselves, destroying our past, and making us think that our foreparents did nothing but pick cotton." 48 Since his assassination, King has been immortalized as an American hero whose birthday is celebrated as a national holiday every January 3. Although he remains an obscure footnote in African American history, Adefunmi is a sought after mystic, priest, teacher, healer, and respected elder in the international New World diaspora as well as in the homeland of the indigenous Yoruba people of southwest Nigeria. In 1981, the Ooni, who is the supreme religious leader of the Yoruba ordered the Chiefs of Ife to perform the rites of coronation on him. "He was crowned, Oba Efuntola Oseijeman Adelabu Adefunmi I and given the ceremonial sword of office inscribed with the name of his Liege Lord, the Ooni, which grants him the rights to speak in the name of the Ooni. He is the first African American to receive such an honor."49

NOTES

1. Lovejoy, Paul. "The African Diaspora: Revisionist Interpretations of Ethnicity, Culture and Religion Under Slavery." Studies in the World History of Slavery, Abolition and Emancipation, II, 1 (1997), 3.

2. Lovejoy, 3.

3. op cit..

4. Mason, John. Idana Fun Orisa. (New York: Yoruba Theological Archninistry, 1999), 45-46.

5. Pieterse, Jan. White On Black: Images of Africa and Blacks in Western Popular Culture. (New Haven and London: Yale University Press 1992,) 23.

6. Washington, Joseph. Anti-Blackness in English Religion: 1500 - 1800. (New York: E. Mellen Press, 1984) 109.

7. Pieterse, 41.

8. Ibid., 35.

9. Washington, 59.

10. Pieterse, 136.

11. Washington, 59.

12. Toll, Robert. Blacking Up: The Minstrel Show in Nineteenth-Century America. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1974), 36.

13. Krasner, David. African American Theatre, 1895 -1910. (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1997), 6.

14. Ibid., 36.

15. DuBois, W.E.B. The Souls of Black Folk. (New York: Modern Library, 1996) 12.

16. Thernstrom, Stephan. America in Black and White. (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1997), 6.

17. Hunt, Carl. Oyotunji Village: The Yoruba Movement in America. (Washington, D.C.: University Press of America, 1970), 24.

18. Ibid. Introduction.

19. "When Was Aborisha, Orisha Worship First Practiced by African Americans in the United States"? Google. 1999 Dec.

20. Mason, 69.

21. Cone, James. Martin & Malcolm & America. (New York: Orbis Books, 1991), 69.

22. Ibid., 75.

23. Hunt. 24.

24. op cit.

25. Ibid., 25.

26. Ibid., 26.

27. Lovejoy, 4.

28. Robeauteau, 48.

29. Ibid., 281.

30. Cone, 71.

31. Ibid., 281.

32. Ibid., 22.

33. Crouch, Stanley. "Unfinished Business." Los Angeles Times 3 Feb. 2002: M1+.

34. Ibid, M6.

35. Lovejoy, 5.

36. Hunt, Introduction.

37. Ibid., 22.

38. op cit.

39. Cone, 64.

40. Hunt, 25.

41. op cit.

42. Wamue, Grace. "Revisiting Our Indigenous Shrines Through Mjungiki." African Affairs: The Journal of the Royal African society. Vol. 100 (No. 400) London: Oxford University Press, 454.

43. Barnes, Sandra. Africa's Ogun. (Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1997), 17.

44. Hunt, Introduction.

45. Ibid., 117.

46. Glatzer, Randi. "Mojo Rising." Vibe. Vol. 7: (No. 10) New York: Miller Publishing Group LLC, Dec. 1999/Jan.2000, 192.

47. op cit.

48. Cone, 118.

49. Ibid. "When Was Aborisha&." Google 1999 Dec.

WORKS CITED

Barnes, Sandra. Africa's Ogun. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1997.

Cone, James. Martin & Malcolm & America. New York: Orbis Books, 1991.

Crouch, Stanley. "Unfinished Business." Los Angeles Times 3 Feb. 2002. M1+.

DuBois, W. E. B. The Souls of Black Folks.

Ekunfeo, Obalorun. "When Was Aborisha, Orisha Worship First Practiced by African Americans in the United States?" Online. Google. 1999 Dec.

Glatzer, Randi. "Mojo Rising." Vibe. Vol. 7: (No. 10). New York: Miller Publishing Group LLC Dec 1999/Jan 2000.

Hunt, Carl. Oyotunji Village: The Yoruba Movement in America. Washington, D.C: University Press of America, 1979.

Krasner, David. African American Theatre, 1895 - 1910. New York: Collier Macmillan, 1984.

Lovejoy, Paul. "The African Diaspora: Revisionist Interpretation of Ethnicity, Culture, and Religion Under Slavery." Studies in the World History of Slavery, Abolition, and Emancipation." II (1997).

Mason, John. Idana Fun Orisa. New York: Yoruba Theological Archninistry, 1999.

---.Olookun. New York: Yoruba Theological Archministry, 1996.

Pieterse, Jan. White On Black: Images of Africa and Blacks in Western Popular Culture. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1991.

Raboteau, Albert. Slave Religion: The "Invisible Institution" in the Antebellum South. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978.

Toll, Robert. Blacking Up: The Minstrel Show in Nineteenth-Century America. New York: Oxford University Press, 1974.

Wamue, Grace. "Revisiting Our Indigenous Shrines Through Mungiki." African Affairs: The Journal of the Royal African Society. Vol. 100: (No. 400). London: Oxford University Press.

King Oseijeman speaks @clark collage

Sat, 15 Dec 2007 22:46:47 GMT

A Long Range Vision

Sat, 15 Dec 2007 22:43:25 GMT

Introducing Kemi Seba

Sat, 15 Dec 2007 22:41:23 GMT

Introducing Kemi Seba
How many of you have heard of brother Kemi Seba? Check him out!

http://galliawatch.blogspot.com/2006/06/kemi-seba-has-france-asked-for-this.html

This exceedingly long interview was conducted by Novopress with Kemi SEBA, leader of the Afro-centrist gang known as Tribe KA. This group is known for its virulent anti-Semitism, its black supremicist philosophy, its violence. The man who murdered Ilan Halimi back in February belonged to Tribe KA, and Dieudonné uses their services as a security force. Recently their website was shut down, but this may not have been a good idea, since we can't monitor their actions and their remarks as easily.

France has asked for this. All countries who, not only open their borders but who renounce their own past, have asked for this, including the United States. Once people like this are given credibility, and are treated with kid gloves, the decay of the host country proceeds apace. I will use a medical analogy already used somewhat differently in another post: You have a cancerous tumor. There is a safe natural way to rid yourself of the tumor, but you choose potent chemicals that not only do not destroy the tumor, they destroy the healthy cells as well.

Likewise, when a problem in a society starts, the safe natural solution should be used for the good of the society as a whole. Instead, our present-day Western leaders have chosen the toxic chemicals of dhimmitude, political correctness, renunciation of the past, pandering, affirmative action, open borders, etc...all designed to destroy the host country. When the host dies, the parasite dies also, but who will know?

I do not know if it is impossible for various races to live side by side, but I do know that there has to be a dominant culture that is strong, proud and unafraid to stop violent behavior, unafraid to expel cancerous elements from its society, unafraid to encourage civic and cultural pride in one's heritage, unafraid to acknowledge the divine, unafraid to put the health and preservation of its own culture ahead of lofty unattainable ideologies.

This interview is insane, pathetic, boring, terrifying and repetitive. It demonstrates the infantile mind of a paranoid person suffering from both an inferiority complex and megalomania.

I doubt anyone will want to read the whole thing, so I am placing the complete version in a separate part of this blog, dated January 1, 2006. If you want to read the whole thing, click here.

Insane people can often be very persuasive. They seem to be rational, and if you are young or dumb or sick yourself, it may be easy to fall under the spell. I doubt that many French people really like this person, but the pressure on them to accept such individuals into their midst has broken their spirit. What does it mean to be a Frenchman, if this sort of thing is allowed to pollute public discourse? He does say one encouraging thing, namely that he intends to leave France for good (when he's been paid in full, of course). And he makes an air-tight case for separation of races.

There are probably lots of spelling and grammar errors, and I did not look up everything as I often do. I don't think it matters much. The following points should be made: Kemite is an invented term based on the word Kemet which he claims is the civilization of ancient Egypt; the names Beyala, Désir and Sopo refer to black men he accuses of Zionism (or something), Malek Boutih is a North African who has attained importance in the Socialist Party; Vercingétorix was the leader of the Gauls at the time of Caesar's conquest; I know nothing of the Curse of Cham, or the black Code, or the Pierrafeu family.(Update June 16: thanks to Charles Henry for the enlightenment about Cham and Pierrafeu - see the comments)

Here is a passage from the introduction by Novopress:

As Novopress always does, we have reproduced the remarks of Kemi SEBA (recorded on the telephone) unabridged, in their natural unaltered state, and without any touching up whatsoever. The completeness and the transparency make up for any loss of ease of style. Each of you is to judge. We know some remarks may shock you, some may even be subject to legal proceedings. We leave full responsibility to their author, who fully accepts these terms, as he says himself. But we must remind everyone of this: breaking the thermometer never brought down the temperature of the sick person. And what follows will not surprise in any way those who have been repeating tirelessly for years that a multi-racial society will lead straight to ethnic war.

The interview begins:

Novopress - Kemi SEBA, you want to give back to black people, whom you call the Kemite people, "the place they deserve". What is this place you speak of?

KS - It's like the head of a family. When the father or mother takes control, the family normally follows them. But when, at some point, there is a break-up of this family, the children start acting like parents and the parents are oppressed by these very children. As Kemites, blacks as you call them, we are the parents of humanity. From there it derives , whether you like it or not, that we have given civilization to humanity, we have given the values of dignity, justice and rectitude. Unfortunately, it becomes very Freudian: at some point the children wanted to kill the father in order to exist. They colonized these parents who had given them life and civilization. That's why it is time to re-set our watches, to put things back in order. It's not about launching into a policy of slavery or colonization of whites. Hatred in revenge never helped anything. With the means that we have we are, quite simply, going to restore to the Kemite people its place as head of family. You're the ones who talk about Mother Earth, mother of all things. The original people who walked and who are still walking this earth have dispersed to the four corners of the globe. But before returning to our lands, we're going to take back what was stolen from us so that we can begin prospering again.

Novopress - You wrote at the website of the Kemite party ( of which you were the spokesman until 2004): "in the days when the Leucoderm (the white man) still walked on all fours in caves, we (the Kemites) were already kings and proprietors of this globe. Consequently we reject integration and we proclaim our right to take back our possessions". Can you elaborate?

KS - I think you have to study a minimum of paleontology, that is, the study of human behavior (sic) in order to see where this stems from. We'll start with a date, some say 4,000 or 3,000 years before what you call Jesus. At the time Kemet began to prosper, the Leucoderms in Europe were living in caves, using fire to keep warm. They were people who ate pork meat, who sometimes even ate their own children. It's a reality attested to by different paleontologists. Did that prevent the West from prospering later? That is not the question. These facts are noted by those very people claiming the supremacy of the West. Herodotus, who is the father of history, said himself that before the Greek Empire could prosper, the West was the Kingdom of the Dead. Because "Occident" comes from the verb "occire" - "to kill". Because at some point, they (the Leucoderms) must have killed each other to survive and to resist a hostile environment. That was the situation at the time when we had our civilization - the Westerners were walking on all fours in caves and eating pork in order to resist this reality. I recommend everyone read a book called Isis Papers, by Frances Cress Welsing, who speaks of the evolution of Westerners up to their present-day behavior patterns, and who explains that finding themselves in such adversity, they had to create certain types of behavior such as individualism, as opposed to altruism, and avidness, cruelty because they were born in an environment that was by its very nature hostile to them.

Novopress - This statement about "white cave-men" is close to the ideas professed by the Nation of Islam, an Afro-American organization. At one time you belonged to the French branch. According to the teachings of its former leader Elijah Muhammad, the white race - a race of demons - was created by genetic manipulation about 6,000 years ago by a black "scientist" named Yacoub, who was rebelling against the idyllic society of blacks that prevailed on earth. Can you confirm this?

KS - I confirm none of that. You know, that was the beginning for me. When you are in elementary school, you know certain things, but at thirty, if you still only know what you knew in elementary school, you are mentally retarded. I've evolved since then, even if some of Elijah Muhammad's teachings are obviously true. This story of Yacoub and all the rest has no legitimacy for me, I can't vouch for it. The only thing I can say is that, contrary to this story of genetic manipulation to create the white race, the ancestor of the Leucoderms was Seth. Seth was the one who symbolized chaos, destruction, anger. He was part of the natural equation, that is, the equation of life. There is the Plus pole and the Minus pole. And the Westerners, the Leucoderms, when they came to Kemet in ancient Egypt, they themselves claimed him as their divinity. It is proven, as I said in my preceding response, that by their behavior, the Westerners show clearly that they have developed a sense of cruelty, of meanness, and sometimes, in some places, of greed with respect to a hostile environment. When you are cold...and there are wolves there who will try to eat you...and your only companion animal is the dog who was there to protect what you call Man, and that we are going to call White Man, the Leucoderm face to face with nature...Today they say that the dog is Man's best friend. No! The dog is White Man's best friend; he is the white man's best friend because in the beginning, the white man was chased out of the Caucasian steppes by all the other animals! It's the truth, and I ask everyone to read these studies and find out for themselves.

It continues:

Novopress - In a certain number of articles and commentaries gleaned on the Internet, it is claimed that Tribe KA and its leader are victims of persecution by the justice system. I find, on the contrary, that the political and judiciary systems have accorded you a degree of tolerance that the defenders of a French France and a European Europe would love to benefit from! You have, for example, created a support group reserved for Kemite children, and your Sunday meetings are also reserved just for you. In comparison, several soup kitchens run by nationalists and serving pork, in various cities in France, have been banned for discrimination and racism. When you see this difference in treatment, don't you think it's true that black skin protects you from the law, like a sunscreen protects from ultra-violet rays?

KS - The comparison is limited and the analogy slanted! You talk of nationalists who are victims of racism or whatever. There is a fundamental difference between the whites and the Kemites today. The one in the position of guilt is not the Kemite, it is the white man! And those who are the aggressors are not the whites, but the Kemites! Dear Monsieur! When you are stabbed in the back with a 17-inch knife, you can pull out 15 inches, but 2 inches still remain. Even when you pull out the whole knife, there is still a scar! That's a fact! The nationalists are charged with racism, but when they give free meals to the whites, and the integrationists are shocked, WE applaud them with enthusiasm. The nationalists demonstrate that they don't like the blacks, and that is a very good thing. But to say that the political judiciary system is against the nationalists more so than against Tribe KA, is to fool oneself completely. When you see how Sarkozy goes after us...until proof to the contrary, he has not yet gone after the nationalist youth. So don't talk about "a double standard", for if there is a "double standard" it is in the way the French State goes after the Tribe KA, or at least tries to, because it can't succeed in wiping us out. I applaud the nationalist youth movements, and I applaud the French nationalist movements, that advocate France for the French and whose first concern is for their own kind. On the other hand, I criticize as forcefully as I can the way in which the Zionist system has managed to infiltrate the nationalists - talking sweet talk to the nationalists, and all the rest. I say to myself: now there's a problem. Don't forget that it is this Zionist system that governs the French State, that manipulates Sarkozy, and Chirac, and the others. And so, if you're going to talk about real nationalist movements, the stranglehold of the Zionists should be rejected, and no one should tell us what is right or wrong for us to do.

This is the last part:

Novopress - Last question. In speaking of the Kemites you have said that "it is time for us to do our own introspection". I'll take you at your word: you live in France, a country traditionally peopled by white men, you speak French, a white man's language, by means of a camera (invented in 1888 by the Frenchman Louis Aimée Augustin Le Prince) or a telephone, another white invention (Alexander Graham Bell and Thomas A. Watson). Haven't you ever thought about what you, YOU, owe to the whites?

KS - I'm going to tell you something: perhaps you don't know history very well, Dear Monsieur! Everything that the West, that France has taken has been taken from the Kemet civilization. You talk about telephones. At one point we had what you call shamans, sorcerers, we didn't need a cell phone to communicate, Dear Monsieur. When you speak of television or other things, I think you should study a minimum of history and not lock yourself into a minimalist culture like the West. I speak French because if I were to "Engala'n enkala" to you, you wouldn't know what it means, but my ancestors, the Kemites, would know. When you're with a Chinese person, you try to speak his language. When I'm with a dog, I try to use signals that he'll understand. That doesn't mean that I like the language of the dog. And if we are filmed by Western cameras, we aren't going to refuse to be filmed since the camera lets our message get out. To France, we owe nothing at all! In the days when you were on all fours, like the Pierrafeu family, in the caves eating game or perhaps even your children, we already had our pyramids and our civilization! Looking at it that way, those who owe us something are certainly the French. We owe nothing to a country that is degenerating, a nation that inherited things that were given to it or that were stolen from us, when you look at history or current affairs. But between the copy-and-paste version and the original, there is no photo. And I repeat, we will not leave until you have returned to us the wealth that you stole. The Eiffel Tower? I couldn't care less! The Champs-Elysées? I couldn't care less! I prefer Nefertiti to your Marianne! And personally, I have no fantasies of your white women. We are not apostles of intermarriage. You will never hear me defend SOS Racism. We say: we will leave your Republic as soon as you publicly remove the names of the puppets you have put at the head of our countries, and as soon as you return what you owe us, Dear Monsieur! And it will be done in blood or in peace. But today, we are already more into blood than into peace...

Again for those interested, read the complete interview here.

Comments, if you have any, should be left here, not at the complete interview web page. Thank you.

Kemi Seba TRIBUKA Dieudotv

Sat, 15 Dec 2007 22:39:02 GMT

Wednesday, July 05, 2006

Wed, 05 Jul 2006 20:05:33 GMT

The Disturbing Health Status of the Black Male

"The life expectancy at birth for black males in the U.S. is lower than that for males in Iran."

Discuss Health Issues

By Sandra L. Gadson, M.D., BlackDoctor.org

In 1990, an article in the ‘New England Journal of Medicine’ reported that “Black men in Harlem were less likely to reach the age of 65 than men in Bangladesh.” A recent comparison of current federal health data with the ‘2005 Human Development Index’ published by the United Nations shows that the poor international health status of black men in the United States persists in the new millennium. Today, the average American can expect to live 5 years longer than a Palestinian -- unless that American is a black male, in which case he can expect to die three years sooner.

The life expectancy at birth for black males in the U.S. (68.8) is lower than that for males in Iran (69.0), Colombia (69.3), and Sri Lanka (71.5) -- populations identified by the United Nations as having “medium human development.” In fact, the average life expectancy for black males is much closer to that of Vietnam, El Salvador, and Iraq than it is to the life expectancy of white males in the U.S. What accounts for this strikingly poor international health status for black males in the U.S.? And, most importantly, what should we do about it?

Some stereotypes are harmless, but believing that blacks don’t contemplate suicide isn’t one of them.

Find out why

A reflection of racial disparities in health

The peculiar paradox of a “Third World” health status for a group living in the richest and most medically advanced country in the world is deeply unsettling. Grasping this phenomenon requires a core understanding of the enduring racial differences in men’s health in the United States. Black males have the shortest life span of all racial or ethnic groups in the nation -- a fact that has remained unchanged for at least the past 100 years. In fact, black men have the highest overall mortality rate across all geographic regions in the U.S. and across all age groups from birth to age 84, with the widest racial gaps in mortality occurring in the prime adult years, ages 25-54.

Racial disparities in men’s health exist across virtually all major chronic diseases. For example, in comparison to their white male counterparts, black men have a 40 percent higher incidence of type 2 diabetes and they are 20% more likely to die from heart disease. Black males ages 22-44 are 20 times more likely to develop kidney failure due to high blood pressure than are white males in the same age group. Black men also have the highest overall cancer incidence and mortality in the country and the highest rates of hypertension in the world.

Racial disparities in men’s health are hardly limited to chronic diseases. For example, black men have the highest HIV incidence and AIDS mortality rates, the highest STD incidence, and the highest homicide rates in the U.S. 5 black veterans are more likely to suffer combat-related post-traumatic stress syndrome.

In addition, black men are severely over represented in the nation’s prisons, and black male inmates have worse health, including higher rates of circulatory disease, HIV, and dental health problems than do white inmates. The black male incarceration rate (3,457 per 100,000) is 8 times higher than that of whites, with black men comprising roughly half (47%) of the nation’s 2.1 million inmates but only 6% of the general population. Black males and females are also over represented among other medically at-risk populations, including foster care residents and the homeless.

The Disturbing Health Status of the Black Male

[Continued]

Root causation

A tremendous and growing volume of research identifies a range of key factors that contribute to racial disparities in health, including behavioral, cultural, socioeconomic, and psychological factors; racism; and healthcare access and quality. Focusing on individual behavior has been our most common approach for addressing racial disparities in men’s health. For example, public health initiatives aimed at reducing chronic disease disparities typically focus on improving diet and exercise behaviors or increasing doctor visits among black men. These interventions often contain cultural components that address such factors as ethnic dietary traditions (e.g., soul food) and male cultural attitudes about acknowledging illness symptoms and putting off doctor visits.

However, individual behavior alone does not fully explain the significant racial differences in morbidity and mortality among U.S. males. As noted, there are many significant factors that contribute to racial disparities in health. One of the most powerful and well-documented factors is socioeconomic status (SES) -- a factor that has long been correlated to human health. Low SES groups tend to have less economic capacity to buy nutritious foods; are more likely to live in communities where there is limited availability of wholesome foods and ubiquitous access to unhealthy foods; and are more likely to be exposed to environmental toxins, cigarette and alcohol advertisements, and violent crime. In the U.S., blacks are significantly more likely to have a lower socioeconomic status. For example, in 2002, the black poverty rate was more than 2.5 times higher, unemployment was nearly twice as high, and black median household earnings were less than 70 cents for every dollar earned by whites.

Notably, although controlling for SES has been shown to substantially reduce racial differences in health, these differences are not altogether eliminated by taking SES into account, suggesting that there are other important factors that cause racial health disparities. For example, researchers have observed that the way in which blacks mentally process their individual and collective experiences of racism can powerfully influence their self-perceptions and health behaviors. Racism is an abnormal phenomenon that stimulates unnatural human behaviors that can prove self-destructive. Black distrust in the medical establishment -- whether based on past or present racial mistreatment, can influence whether or not a black individual seeks medical attention or complies with medical advice.

Indeed, perhaps the most troubling root cause of higher morbidity for black men (and women) is the phenomenon of pervasive racial inequality in healthcare. At least 8 major studies and independent reviews, most notably the Institute of Medicine’s 2002 report “Unequal Treatment,” have verified that there are serious and persistent differences in the quality of healthcare delivered to blacks versus whites. The IOM report found that even when you control for such factors as insurance, education, severity of illness, and compliance with medical advice, black men and women receive a significantly lower quality of care than do their white counterparts.

Racial disparities in healthcare exist in treatments for heart disease, cancer, stroke, diabetes, end-stage renal disease, asthma, pneumonia and AIDS. Disparities even arise from such routine clinical procedures as history-taking, physical examination and pain management. The IOM report found that these entrenched racial patterns of “unequal treatment” result in significantly higher death rates for black men and women.

The Disturbing Health Status of the Black Male

[Continued]

A multidimensional national response

Our nation’s capacity to eradicate racial disparities in men’s health -- and thereby abolish the “third world” health status of black men, depends significantly on our ability to acknowledge all of the root causes of health inequality and to put into place effective policies and interventions to address them. Rising to this challenge requires a vigorous, sustained, and multidimensional national commitment. Several important lessons emerge from the evidence base to inform this commitment.

First, disease prevention and health promotion must be the mainstay of our intervention. Seven of the top ten leading causes of death for black men in the U.S. are treatable and preventable diseases. However, we must shift the paradigm from a behavior-only prevention model to one that addresses black male behavior in a broader and more meaningful structural context. How people act and live are in no small part shaped -- though not necessarily dictated, by the larger cultural, environmental, and socioeconomic circumstances in which they exist.

Health disparity policies and interventions for black male populations must establish a realistic balance between promoting behavior change and significantly altering the structural and environmental factors that interact with behavior. Thus, in addition to the micro-level prioritizing of basic health promotion and disease prevention, there must also be a macro-level focus on improving the socioeconomic status of black men.

Second, we must close the racial gap in healthcare. It is unacceptable that despite our extraordinary advances in medicine, our health system continues to grapple with the fundamental task of how to deliver equitable, high-quality health care to all of our nation’s citizens regardless of race or ethnicity. In 2004, the Sullivan Commission, a multi-racial body of national leaders in healthcare, business, and law, chaired by former health secretary Louis Sullivan, put forth a viable and promising dual approach for addressing racial inequality: (1) increasing diversity and (2) improving cultural competence in the healthcare workforce.

Indeed, our nation must move forward with greater speed in producing an ample supply of minority health professionals at all levels of the healthcare system, including clinical care, research, public health and the academia. We must also ensure that the general healthcare workforce -- and the academic pipeline leading to the workforce -- provide comprehensive opportunities for training in cultural competence.

Third, we must address the access problem wherein minorities are disproportionately over represented among the nation’s 45.8 million people who have no medical insurance. Racial and ethnic minority groups comprise one-third of the nation’s population but over half of the uninsured; one out of five blacks compared to one out of ten whites utilize Medicaid for medical coverage. The uninsured are more likely to postpone or forgo care, which increases their chances of illness, disability, and premature death. Consequently, the uninsured are less likely to receive needed services for life-threatening health problems, including heart disease, diabetes, hypertension and cancer.

The ongoing health crisis of black men in the U.S. is a multidimensional problem that requires a multilevel remedy. Raising the overall health status of our black male population to that of a western nation requires addressing the dynamic root causes of health inequality, while upholding the highest standards of disease prevention and healthcare access and quality.

Sandra L. Gadson, M.D. is president of the National Medical Association. This article is provided courtesy of BlackDoctor.org.

Thursday, March 02, 2006

Thu, 02 Mar 2006 21:59:39 GMT

CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS LEADERS MAKE THEIR VOICES HEARD ACROSS AIRWAVES IN FIGHT AGAINST PROSTATE CANCER

Black Congress Leaders Partner with PHEN to Launch National Radio Campaign

Thomas A. Farrington, President and Founder of the Prostate Health Education Network, center, joined by Congressman Gregory W. Meeks (D-NY), left, and Senator Barack Obama (D-IL), on Capitol Hill.

Cambridge, MA(BlackNews.com) - Black men in this country die from prostate cancer at a rate that is more than twice that of white men (2.4 times). This is the largest racial disparity for any type of major cancer afflicting men or women.

In response to these conditions, Chairman Melvin Watt (D-NC), and other members of the US Congressional Black Caucus have partnered with The Prostate Health Education Network (PHEN) to launch a national awareness campaign, to help reduce the African American prostate cancer disparity.

Black Congressional leaders can be heard voicing their messages over the radio, and urging men and women within their own cities and states to learn more about prostate health and education. Participating Congressman include: William "Lacy" Clay (D-MO); Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO); James Clyburn (D-SC); Elijah Cummings (D-MD); Artur Davis (D-AL); Chaka Fattah (D-PA); Jesse Jackson, Jr. (D-IL); Kendrick Meek (D-FL); Gregory Meeks (D-NY); Donald Payne (D-NJ); Robert Scott (D-VA); and Edolphus Towns (D-NY).

"We are fortunate and so pleased to have our Black Congressional leadership step forward and take action to address the prostate cancer racial disparity. There is a lot of work to be done but their involvement will help PHEN's cause to save lives and give this issue the national visibility that it needs," said Thomas A. Farrington, PHEN's founder and president.

PHEN's Airwaves Campaign consists of a blitz of Ads, PSA's, and live radio interviews. PHEN also uses the Internet, blogs and satellite radio in its campaign.

Some studies show that more than 50% of men diagnosed with prostate cancer are made aware of their condition after being urged to take an examination by a caring woman in their lives. Therefore, Congresswomen members of the Black Caucus have also taken on the role as leading advocates by recording PHEN awareness messages, aimed at encouraging women to become active in the prostate health care of their husbands, fathers, sons and other male loved ones. These Congresswomen include; Corrine Brown (D-FL), Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D-OH), Eddie Bernice Johnson, (D-TX), Maxine Waters (D-CA), and Diane Watson (D-CA).

To listen to the prostate health education and awareness messages recorded by the Congressional leaders, visit PHEN's website at www.PROSTATEHEALTHED.com and click on your own city or state.

ABOUT THE PROSTATE HEALTH EDUCATION NETWORK (PHEN)
The Prostate Health Education Network, Inc. is a 501c3 non-profit organization with a mission to eliminate the African American prostate cancer disparity through advocacy, education and awareness. PHEN encourages organizations to link to its website to help promote the awareness campaign.

Wednesday, February 22, 2006

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 01:17:39 GMT

Malcolm And Martin

AOL Black Voices

This year Black Voices launched our Black History Month festivities on Martin Luther King Jr. Day, the annual mid-January commemoration of the life and work of the civil rights movement's most celebrated leader, a man who so changed the country and the world, that the nation has deemed it fitting to honor him in perpetuity by making his birthday a national holiday.

But, of course, King was not alone in provoking the historic shifts in thinking during what we now regard as the civil rights era. And so it may be equally fitting that as we approach the end of Black History Month, that we re-examine the contributions of another giant of the movement, who offered a radically different world view from King's.

This month marks the 41st anniversary of the death of Malcolm X, who for much of the time he was alive and talking about freedom and justice for American blacks, presented a stark counterpoint to King's approach of civil disobedience. One called for nonviolent change, the other armed revolution. King sought to inspire and calm; Malcolm set out to inflame and agitate. Amazingly, they never had a real conversation, but Malcolm X, a few weeks before he died, would tell King's wife, Coretta, that maybe his confrontational tactics would make it easier for her husband to succeed. "If white people realize what the alternative is," he explained, "perhaps they will be more willing to hear Dr. King."

Both men would die at the hands of assassins; both were 39, both left behind large families and formidable and influential widows. And each came to embody an idea and an approach about how racial justice was to be achieved -- King's non-violent negotiation and compromise or Malcolm’s confrontation and conflict. As the fight for racial justice continues, the interplay between their two philosophies continues a generation after their deaths.

King was a disciple of Ghandi who insisted that non-violence was the only effective way to wage the battle for equality. Malcolm X, thought that approach naïve and counterproductive. King pushed a racial idyll, most famously in his "I Have Dream Speech" in which he longed for an end to segregation and the dawn of a racial harmony, when "little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and little white girls."

Malcolm X was a self-described revolutionary, who adopted both the rhetoric and tactics of one. He often derided the idea that black people, who had been so viciously and violently oppressed, should resort to peaceful means to achieve their freedom. In November 1963, three months after King's speech at the March on Washington, Malcolm X had this to say about non-violent struggle: "The only revolution in which the goal is loving your enemy, is the Negro revolution." And for effect, "Revolution is bloody, revolution is hostile, revolution knows no compromise, revolution destroys and over turns everything that gets in its way," he added.

The March on Washington, which stands as an iconic American moment, only drew Malcolm X's scorn: He thought it had been hijacked by white moderates and liberals for their own purposes: "And as they took it over it lost its militancy," he lamented a few months later, "It ceased to be angry, it ceased to be hot, it ceased to be uncompromising."

It is fair to note that King is held in much wider regard: He won to Nobel Peace Prize, after all: His birthday is a national holiday, and when his widow passed away a few weeks ago, four U.S. presidents shared the stage at her funeral. The best Malcolm X could do on that front was to have his face on a U. S. postage stamp, but there are those who would argue that the revolutionary spirit of Malcolm X is more vibrant in today’s culture than the often passive/aggressive approach of King’s non-violent movement.

There are those who point to hip-hop, the dominant cultural motif of the moment, as more evidence that Malcolm has had his triumphs. With its often stridently political rhetoric and confrontational attitude, hip-hop, is more Malcolm than Martin.

And all across the country this week there will be tributes to the fiery slain leader. From Nebraska to Ohio there are Malcolm X memorials planned. Students in Indiana are putting on a play in which Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. eventually have a conversation. The two men had a brief and cordial meeting in March 1964 when they ran into each other in the U.S. Capitol, but they never really talked, except, of course, on the larger historical stage. The debate endures.

AfrikanDiamond's Xanga

Kwanzaa Stories: Benjamin "Pap" Singleton- The Black Exodusters

The King Shark - Oba Behanzin

(In)Visibility and Duality of the Civil Rights and Yoruba Movements: 1950s-1990s

King Oseijeman speaks @clark collage

A Long Range Vision

Introducing Kemi Seba

Kemi Seba TRIBUKA Dieudotv

Wednesday, July 05, 2006

Failing Health Report

Black Men and Suicide

Thursday, March 02, 2006

Wednesday, February 22, 2006

Malcolm X (1925-1965)

Listen to BHM Radio